4.1 Article

Genome-Wide Association Study of Lymphoblast Cell Viability After Clozapine Exposure

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32287

关键词

Genome-wide association study; lymphoblasts; clozapine; agranulocytosis; cell viability; clozapine-induced agranulocytosis

资金

  1. NIH
  2. 'Stichting De Drie Lichten'

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clozapine is an antipsychotic drug with proven efficacy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia but also known to induce potentially lethal agranulocytosis (CIA) in 1% of patients. Genetic factors are likely to play a role in the molecular basis of CIA. We explored an in vitro system to study the genetic susceptibility of CIA. Cell viability was measured in 90 lymphoblast cell lines exposed to a series of increasing concentrations of clozapine for 48hr. Quantitative trait measures of cell viability as well as area under the survival curve were used in a linear mixed model for genome-wide association analyses. The estimated heritability of clozapine-induced cell viability reduction in these cell lines is h(2)=0.76. No genome-wide significant association was observed after correction for multiple testing. Two independent loci with nominal evidence of association were observed at 30x clinical clozapine concentration: rs2709505 (P=1.41x10(-8)) in an intron of MDFIC and rs10457252 (P=1.79x10(-8)) located in a gene desert at chromosome 6q21. We identified one locus (rs1293970) near PRG4 that was consistently associated for all separate concentration analyses at P<5x10(-5). PRG4 encodes hemangiopoietin, a growth stimulator for hematopoietic stem cells. No evidence was observed for involvement of the MHC region. Our results demonstrate that clozapine-induced viability reduction in lymphoblast cell lines is a heritable, polygenic trait. Thus, in vitro models of CIA might be a useful tool for future discovery of genetic risk factors, although larger sample sizes will be required to unambiguously identify these loci. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据