4.7 Article

Origin of plastic anisotropy in (ultra)-fine-grained Mg-Zn-Zr alloy processed by isothermal multi-step forging and rolling: Experiments and modeling

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.12.045

关键词

Magnesium alloys; Multi-step isothermal forging; Rolling; Texture; Anisotropy

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CMMI-1727495, CMMI-1728224]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports a strong effect of multi-step forging (MIF) followed by elevated temperature isothermal rolling (IR) on the yield stress in ZK60 Mg alloy. After the MIF stage, the yield stress is slightly higher in the rolling direction (RD) than in the transverse direction (TD). After IR at 300 degrees C, the anisotropy remains small. In contrast, after IR at a lower temperature 200 degrees C, a significant difference in yield stress between the RD and TD directions is observed, found to increase with rolling strain, and even reverse from being higher to being much lower in the RD than in the TD with rolling reduction at 200 degrees C. To help determine the possible causes for the anisotropy and its evolution with straining, we use a multi-scale elasto-plastic self-consistent polycrystal model that accounts for dislocation density (Taylor hardening), precipitate hardening, texture, and grain size. The model is extended here to also include the effects of type I and type II residual stresses. With a combination of modeling and electron microscopy, we find that texture, grain size distribution, residual stresses, Taylor hardening, and Orowan hardening only have moderate effects on the plastic anisotropy and cannot fully explain the observations. We rationalize that the primary origin of the yield anisotropy is the evolution of the secondary precipitates, which become distributed in the plane of the rolled sheet during rolling. They become more aligned in the RD plane during IR, causing strengthening in tensile yield stress in the TD over that in the RD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据