4.6 Article

Immobilization of ZnO/polyaniline heterojunction on electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofibers and enhanced photocatalytic activity

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 214, 期 -, 页码 507-515

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.04.053

关键词

Electrospinning; In-situ polymerization; Atomic layer deposition; Nanofiber; Photocatalysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51572045, 51272041, 61201107, 11604044, 91233204]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB933703]
  3. 111 Project [B13013]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province of China [20160101313JC]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2412017FZ009, 2412017QD007, 2412016KJ017]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M610188]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyaniline (PANI) particles were immobilized on electrospun polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofibers (NFs) to form PAN@PANI NFs via in situ polymerization at room temperature. Then, ZnO was deposited on the surface of PAN@PANI NFs by atomic layer deposition (ALD) to form PAN@PANI@ZnO NFs. The PANI and ZnO contents were well controlled by adjusting the polymerization time and the number of ALD cycles, respectively. The obtained PAN@PANI@ZnO NFs exhibited higher photocatalytic activity for the degradation of methylene blue under ultraviolet light irradiation than PAN@PANI and PAN@ZnO NFs, and the first-order degradation rate constant (k(app)) of PAN@PANI@ZnO NFs formed with 400 ALD cycles was greater than that of PAN@ZnO NFs formed with 400 ALD cycles by a factor of 2.1. The enhanced photocatalytic activity is shown to originate from the improved charge separation of photogenerated electrons and holes due to the formation of ZnO/PANI heterojunctions in PAN@PANI@ZnO NFs. The obtained PAN@PANI@ZnO photocatalysts are easily recycled with little decrease in photocatalytic activity because of their macroscopic mat structure and flexibility. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据