4.6 Article

Genomic Selection Using BayesC and GBLUP for Resistance Against Edwardsiella tarda in Japanese Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus)

期刊

MARINE BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 559-565

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10126-018-9839-z

关键词

Genomic selection; BayesC; GBLUP; Edwardsiella tarda; Japanese flounder

资金

  1. Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, CAFS [2016HY-ZD02]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31461163005, 31570078]
  3. Taishan Scholar Climbing Program of Shandong Province, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Japanese flounder is one of the most widely farmed economic flatfish species throughout eastern Asia including China, Korea, and Japan. Edwardsiella tarda is a major species of pathogenic bacteria that causes ascites disease and, consequently, a huge economy loss for Japanese flounder farming. After generation selection, traditional breeding methods can hardly improve the E. tarda resistance effectively. Genomic selection is an effective way to predict the breeding potential of parents and has rarely been used in aquatic breeding. In this study, we chose 931 individuals from 90 families, challenged by E. tarda from 2013 to 2015 as a reference population and 71 parents of these families as selection candidates. 1,934,475 markers were detected via genome sequencing and applied in this study. Two different methods, BayesC and GBLUP, were used for genomic prediction. In the reference population, two methods led to the same accuracy (0.946) and Pearson's correlation results between phenotype and genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) of BayesC and GBLUP were 0.912 and 0.761, respectively. In selection candidates, GEBVs from two methods were highly similar (0.980). A comparison of GEBV with the survival rate of families that were structured by selection candidates showed correlations of 0.662 and 0.665, respectively. This study established a genomic selection method for the Japanese flounder and for the first time applied this to E. tarda resistance breeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据