4.5 Article

Association of polymorphisms in LEPR with type 2 diabetes and related metabolic traits in a Chinese population

期刊

LIPIDS IN HEALTH AND DISEASE
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12944-017-0644-x

关键词

Type 2 diabetes mellitus; LEPR gene; Polymorphism; Blood pressure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81460159, 81760145, 81260130]
  2. Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi [2017GXNSFDA198032]
  3. Important Specific Projects for Precision Medicine National Annual Project [2016YFC0901200, 2016YFC0901205]
  4. Scientific Research Specific Projects for Public Welfare (Medical) [201502007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Backgrou nd: Leptin acts as a mediator of inflammation and energy homeostasis by activating leptin receptor (LEPR). We conducted this study to explore the association of polymorphisms in LEPR with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its related metabolic traits. Methods: We performed a case-control study to investigate the association of polymorphisms in LEPR with T2DM and related metabolic traits in a Chinese population, with a total of 922 T2DM patients and 1031 nondiabetic subjects. Polymorphisms were genotyped using MassARRAY assay. Results: The G allele of rs1327118 was associated with a decreased risk of T2DM in men (P = 0.044, odds ratio = 0.707, 95% confidence interval = 0.504-0.991) and the G allele of rs3806318 was associated with increased systolic blood pressure (SBP) in men with T2DM. Besides, the women patients carrying the G allele of rs1327118 showed increased SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels, but decreased high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level. Conclusion: Our results suggest that rs1327118 may be associated with SBP, DBP and HDL-C levels in women with T2DM, and rs3806318 may be associated with T2DM and SBP level in men with T2DM. Further studies with larger sample size or functional experiments focused on exact mechanism are required to verify our observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据