4.6 Article

Intake of Trace Metals and the Risk of Incident Kidney Stones

期刊

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 199, 期 6, 页码 1535-1540

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.01.077

关键词

kidney calculi; zinc; iron; manganese; nutritional status

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health Research [DK094910, DK91417, CA186107, CA176726, CA167552]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The association between the intake of trace metals and the risk of incident stones has not been longitudinally investigated. Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective analysis of 193,551 participants in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, and the Nurses' Health Study I and II. During a followup of 3,316,580 person-years there was a total of 6,576 incident stones. We used multivariate regression models to identify associations of the intake of zinc, iron, copper and manganese with the risk of stones. In a subset of participants with 24-hour urine collections we examined the association between the intake of trace metals and urine composition. Results: After multivariate adjustment total and dietary intakes of zinc and iron were not significantly associated with incident stones. A higher intake of manganese was associated with a lower risk of stones. The pooled HR of the highest quintile of total manganese intake compared with the lowest intake was 0.82 (95% CI 0.68-0.98, p = 0.02). Total but not dietary copper intake was marginally associated with a higher risk of stones (pooled HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28, p = 0.01). There were no statistically significant associations of the total intake of manganese and copper with urinary supersaturation. Conclusions: Zinc and iron intake was not associated with a risk of stones. Copper intake may be associated with a higher risk in some individuals. Higher total manganese intake was associated with a lower risk of stones but not with traditional 24-hour urinary composite markers of stone risk. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms by which manganese may reduce kidney stone formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据