4.7 Article

Synthesis of amino-functionalization magnetic multi-metal organic framework (Fe3O4/MIL-101(Al0.9Fe0.1)/NH2) for efficient removal of methyl orange from aqueous solution

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2018.03.009

关键词

Fe3O4/MIL-101(Al0.9Fe0.1)/NH2; Methyl orange; Multi-metal organic framework; Wastewater

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21367016, 51104073]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [51408282]
  3. National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China(973 Program) [2014CB643404]
  4. Yunnan Provincial Department of Education [2015Z044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An amino-functionalization magnetic multi-metal organic framework material (called Fe3O4/MIL-101(Al0.9Fe0.1)/NH2), synthesized by a versatile step-by-step assembly method, has been investigated as a convenient and effective adsorbent for methyl orange (MO). The synthesized nano-adsorbent was characterized by TEM, TGA, SEM, FTIR, VSM, XPS and BET, XRD, respectively. Various factors influencing the adsorption of MO such as the adsorbent dosage, initial concentration of MO, the contact time, pH value of the solutions and the temperatures were studied by batch experiments. The results indicated that it agreed well to the Langmuir adsorption model, and the maximum adsorption capacities of MO were found to be 355.8 mg/g at pH 6.0. Kinetic data showed good correlation with pseudo-second-order equation. The results of adsorption thermodynamic studies illustrate that the sorption is exothermic, spontaneous and decreased randomness of the system. Besides, good magnetic performance of Fe3O4/MIL-101(Al0.9Fe0.1)/NH2 makes it simply achieve the solid-liquid separation at low magnetic field within 5 min. In addition, compared with Fe3O4/MIL-101(Al)/NH2, the Fe3O4/MIL-101(Al0.9Fe0.1)/NH2 not only showed higher removal efficiency toward MO, but also had higher stability in aqueous solution. (C) 2018 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据