4.7 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: Diagnosis of Microvascular Angina Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (Retracted article. See vol. 76, pg. 1916, 2020)

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.046

关键词

cardiac magnetic resonance; index of microcirculatory resistance; inducible ischemia; microvascular dysfunction; myocardial perfusion reserve index

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation Clinical Research Training Fellowship [FS/15/11/31233]
  2. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
  3. British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence [RE/08/004]
  4. British Heart Foundation [FS/15/11/31233] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND In patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD), confirming symptoms due to coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) remains challenging. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) assesses myocardial perfusion with high spatial resolution and is widely used for diagnosing obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to validate CMR for diagnosing microvascular angina in patients with NOCAD, compared with patients with obstructive CAD and correlated to the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) during invasive coronary angiography. METHODS Fifty patients with angina (65 +/- 9 years of age) and 20 age-matched healthy control subjects underwent adenosine stress CMR (1.5- and 3-T) to assess left ventricular function, inducible ischemia (myocardial perfusion reserve index [MPRI]; myocardial blood flow [MBF]), and infarction (late gadolinium enhancement). During subsequent angiography within 7 days, 28 patients had obstructive CAD (fractional flow reserve [FFR] <= 0.8) and 22 patients had NOCAD (FFR >0.8) who underwent 3-vessel IMR measurements. RESULTS In patients with NOCAD, myocardium with IMR <25 U had normal MPRI (1.9 +/- 0.4 vs. controls 2.0 +/- 0.3; p = 0.49); myocardium with IMR >= 25 U had significantly impaired MPRI, similar to ischemic myocardium downstream of obstructive CAD (1.2 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.4; p = 0.61). An MPRI of 1.4 accurately detected impaired perfusion related to CMD (IMR >= 25 U; FFR >0.8) (area under the curve: 0.90; specificity: 95%; sensitivity: 89%; p < 0.001). Impaired MPRI in patients with NOCAD was driven by impaired augmentation of MBF during stress, with normal resting MBF. Myocardium with FFR >0.8 and normal IMR (< 25 U) still had blunted stress MBF, suggesting mild CMD, which was distinguishable from control subjects by using a stress MBF threshold of 2.3 ml/min/g with 100% positive predictive value. CONCLUSIONS In angina patients with NOCAD, CMR can objectively and noninvasively assess microvascular angina. A CMR-based combined diagnostic pathway for both epicardial and microvascular CAD deserves further clinical validation. (c) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the AmericanCollege of Cardiology Foundation. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据