4.8 Article

Universal Relationship between Molecular Structure and Crystal Structure in Peptoid Polymers and Prevalence of the &ITcis&IT Backbone Conformation

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 140, 期 2, 页码 827-833

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b11891

关键词

-

资金

  1. Soft Matter Electron Microscopy Program - Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Science, US Department of Energy [KC11BN, DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Science, US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peptoid polymers are often crystalline in the solid-state as examined by X-ray scattering, but thus far, there has been no attempt to identify a common structural motif among them. In order to probe the relationship between molecular structure and crystal structure, we synthesized and analyzed a series of crystalline peptoid copolymers, systematically varying peptoid side-chain length (S) and main-chainlength (N). We also examined X-ray scattering data from 18 previously reported peptoid polymers. In all peptoids, we found that the unit cell dimensions, a, b, and c, are simple functions of S and N: a (angstrom) = 4.55, b (angstrom) = [2.98]N + 0.35, and c (angstrom) = [1.86]S + 5.5. These relationships,which apply to both bulk crystals and self-assembled nanosheets in water, indicate that the molecules adopt extended, planar conformations. Furthermore, we performed molecular dynamics simulations (MD) of peptoid polymer lattices, which indicate that all backbone amides adopt the cis conformation. This is a surprising conclusion, because previous studies on isolated molecules indicated an energetic preference for the trans conformer. This study demonstrates that when packed into supramolecular lattices or crystals, peptoid polymers prefer to adopt a regular, extended, all-cis secondary structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据