4.8 Article

Structure and Reactivity of Half-Sandwich Rh(+3) and Ir(+3) Carbene Complexes. Catalytic Metathesis of Azobenzene Derivatives

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 140, 期 5, 页码 1884-1893

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b12673

关键词

-

资金

  1. MPG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional rhodium carbene chemistry relies on the controlled decomposition of diazo derivatives with [Rh-2(OAc)(4).] or related dinuclear Rh(+2) complexes, whereas the use of other rhodium sources is much less developed. It is now shown that half-sandwich carbene species derived from [CP*MX2](2) (M = Rh, Ir; X = Cl, Br, I, Cp* = pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) also exhibit favorable application profiles. Interestingly, the anionic ligand X proved to be a critical determinant of reactivity in the case of cyclo-propanation, epoxide formation and the previously unknown catalytic metathesis of azobenzene derivatives, whereas the nature of X does not play any significant role in OH insertion reactions. This perplexing disparity can be explained on the basis of spectral and crystallographic data of a representative set of carbene complexes of this type, which could be isolated despite their pronounced electrophilicity. Specifically, the donor/acceptor carbene 10a derived from ArC(=N-2)COOMe and [Cp*RhCl2](2) undergoes spontaneous 1,2-migratory insertion of the emerging carbene unit into the Rh-Cl bond with formation of the C-metalated rhodium enolate 11. In contrast, the analogous complexes 10b,c derived from [Cp*RhX2](2) = Br, I) as well as the iridium species 13 and 14 derived from [Cp*IrCl2](2) are sufficiently stable and allow true carbene reactivity to be harnessed. These complexes are competent intermediates for the catalytic metathesis of azobenzene derivatives, which provides access to alpha-imino esters that would be difficult to make otherwise. Rather than involving metal nitrenes, the reaction proceeds via aza-ylides that evolve into diaziridines; a metastable compound of this type has been fully characterized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据