4.2 Article

Development and numerical validation of an improved prediction model for wheel-soil interaction under multiple operating conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF TERRAMECHANICS
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 1-21

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2018.04.005

关键词

Wheel-soil interaction; Prediction model; Lug effects; Multiple operating conditions; Discrete element method

资金

  1. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [51605483]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2017YFB1300900]
  3. Science Foundation of National University of Defense Technology [ZK16-03-14, ZK17-03-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the establishment and validation of an improved model predicting tractive parameters of a lugged wheel under multiple operating conditions. During the basic straight driving wheel-soil interaction, the common-used equivalent radius theory and the bulldozing theory are combined to calculate the lug effects referring the traditional theories of soil stress distribution, while the bulldozing effect is reconsidered according to the work conservation. On the basis of the further prediction under multiple conditions including the inclination in three degrees of freedom and the turning driving, the numerical model using the discrete element method under each operating condition is separately established. Under such circumstances, the validation and analysis are conducted differing in sizes and driving parameters of the wheel. It is indicated that the improved model displays the better reasonability and precision in predicting lug effects of a heavy off-road wheel. This model is mostly accurate and sensitive to the variation of parameters under straight and inclining driving conditions, but demands further correction during low slipping of the turning condition. Generally, the improved model in this paper focuses on the prediction of drawbar pull and driving torque, but lacks precision in the tendency of sinkage. (C) 2018 ISTVS. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据