4.8 Article

Improving optimal control of grid-connected lithium-ion batteries through more accurate battery and degradation modelling

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 379, 期 -, 页码 91-102

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.01.004

关键词

Lithium ion; Degradation; Grid-connected battery; Optimal control; Battery ageing; Battery modelling

资金

  1. VITO
  2. EnergyVille, Belgium
  3. European Union [608931]
  4. SolSThore project - European Union
  5. European Regional Development Fund ERDF
  6. Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship
  7. Province of Limburg
  8. EPSRC [EP/P020402/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increased deployment of intermittent renewable energy generators opens up opportunities for grid-connected energy storage. Batteries offer significant flexibility but are relatively expensive at present. Battery lifetime is a key factor in the business case, and it depends on usage, but most techno-economic analyses do not account for this. For the first time, this paper quantifies the annual benefits of grid-connected batteries including realistic physical dynamics and nonlinear electrochemical degradation. Three lithium-ion battery models of increasing realism are formulated, and the predicted degradation of each is compared with a large-scale experimental degradation data set (Mat4Bat). A respective improvement in RMS capacity prediction error from 11% to 5% is found by increasing the model accuracy. The three models are then used within an optimal control algorithm to perform price arbitrage over one year, including degradation. Results show that the revenue can be increased substantially while degradation can be reduced by using more realistic models. The estimated best case profit using a sophisticated model is a 175% improvement compared with the simplest model. This illustrates that using a simplistic battery model in a techno-economic assessment of grid-connected batteries might substantially underestimate the business case and lead to erroneous conclusions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据