4.6 Article

DNA methylation in the central and efferent limbs of the chemoreflex requires carotid body neural activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 596, 期 15, 页码 3087-3100

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/JP274833

关键词

sleep apnea; intermittent hypoxia; anti-oxidant enzymes; DNA methyltransferases; GSK3; blood pressure

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [P01-HL-90554]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-term exposure to intermittent hypoxia (LT-IH; 30days), simulating blood O-2 profiles during sleep apnoea, has been shown to repress anti-oxidant enzyme (AOE) gene expression by DNA methylation in the carotid body (CB) reflex pathway, resulting in persistent elevation of plasma catecholamine levels and blood pressure. The present study examined the mechanisms by which LT-IH induces DNA methylation. Adult rats exposed to LT-IH showed elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the CB, nucleus tractus solitarius (nTS) and rostroventrolateral medulla (RVLM) and adrenal medulla (AM), which represent the central and efferent limbs of the CB reflex, respectively. ROS scavenger treatment during the first ten days of IH exposure prevented ROS accumulation, blocked DNA methylation, and normalized AOE gene expression, suggesting that ROS generated during the early stages of IH activate DNA methylation. CB ablation prevented the ROS accumulation, normalized AOE gene expression in the nTS, RVLM, and AM and blocked DNA methylation, suggesting that LT-IH-induced DNA methylation in the central and efferent limbs of the CB reflex is indirect and requires CB neural activity. LT-IH increased DNA methyl transferase (Dnmt) activity through upregulation of Dnmt1 and 3b protein expression due to ROS-dependent inactivation of glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) by protein kinase B (Akt). Treating rats with the pan-Akt inhibitor GSK690693 blocked the induction of Dnmt activity, Dnmt protein expression, and DNA methylation, leading to normalization of AOE gene expression as well as plasma catecholamine levels and blood pressure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据