4.6 Article

Role of Structural Defects in the Water Adsorption Properties of MOF-801

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 122, 期 10, 页码 5545-5552

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b00014

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE)
  3. National Science Foundation [ACI-1548562]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nanoporous and tunable nature of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) has made them promising adsorbents for water adsorption applications such as water harvesting and adsorptive heat pumps. In these applications, water adsorption properties in MOFs play a crucial role. However, understanding their structural defects and how defects influence adsorption thermodynamics remains limited to date. In this work, by employing Monte Carlo techniques and first-Principle density functional theory calculations, we investigate the effect of defects on the water adsorption properties in MOF-801 structures at an atomic level. Our calculations show that the adsorption isotherm in perfect MOF-801 (without defects) greatly deviates from that measured experimentally. With the introduction of defects with a high density, a reasonably good agreement can be achieved, suggesting that a high defect density in MOF-801 may be responsible for its hydrophilic adsorptive behaviors. Further, water adsorption properties in MOF-801 structures are found to depend on the spatial configuration of defects, and water condensation in nanoporous MOF-801 is identified to occur preferentially along the (110) direction. Detailed structural characteristics (accessible volume, etc.) of MOF-801 structures and the adsorption energetics of water in the frameworks are also studied and correlated with the computed adsorption isotherms. Our findings reveal important insights into the role of defects, offering a microscopic picture to help facilitate the rational design of better MOFs for water adsorption applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据