4.5 Article

Virtual Site OPLS Force Field for Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquids

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 122, 期 11, 页码 2962-2974

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b11996

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1562205]
  2. Center for Computational Science at the University of Miami
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1562205] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular simulations of ionic liquids can provide deeper insight into the relationship between intermolecular interactions and macroscopic measurements for the solvents. However, many existing force fields have multiple shortcomings, including poor solvent dynamics, the underestimation of hydrogen-bonding strength, and errors in solvent interactions/organization. A new force field, called optimized potentials for liquid simulation-ionic-liquid virtual site (OPLS-VSIL), has been developed for imidazolium-based ionic liquids featuring a novel topology incorporating a virtual site bisecting the nitrogen atoms that offloads negative charge to inside the plane of the ring. Guided by free energy of hydration calculations, an empirically derived set of partial charges and nonbonded Lennard-Jones terms for both 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium and 11 different anions provided accurate bulk-phase ionic-liquid properties and produced radial distribution functions nearly indistinguishable from ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. For example, overall mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 3.1-3.4% were computed for the density, heat of vaporization, and viscosity of approximately 20 different ion pair combinations. Additional physical properties, such as, self-diffusion coefficients, heat capacity, and surface tension also gave significant MAE improvements using OPLS-VSIL compared to the existing fixed-charge ionic-liquid force fields. Local interactions, including cation anion hydrogen bonding and if pi-pi stacking between the imidazolium rings, were also accurately reproduced.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据