4.5 Article

Rationalizing the Color in Heavenly Blue Anthocyanin: A Complete Kinetic and Thermodynamic Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 122, 期 19, 页码 4982-4992

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b01136

关键词

-

资金

  1. FCT/MEC [UID/QUI/50006/2013, SFRH/BPD/84805/2012]
  2. ERDF [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007265]
  3. CON-ACyT [MEX/Ref. 288188]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All equilibrium and rate constants of heavenly blue anthocyanin (HBA 1) as well as the derivatives with two (HBA 2) or none (HBA 3) acylated units were determined. The three acylated units of the sugar in position 3 of the peonidin chromophore of HBA 1 are essential to confer the peculiar stability of its purple and blue colors. The sugars generate an efficient protective environment around position 2 (and 4) of the flavylium cation, through an intramolecular sandwich-type stacking that retards 35-fold the hydration reaction (k(h)) and increases 8.8-fold the dehydration reaction (k(-h)), when compared with the peonidin chromophore HBA 3. The conjugation of these two rates lowers 308-fold the hydration equilibrium constant (K-h), corresponding to a raise of the energy level of the hemiketal by 14.2 kj mol(-1). Conversely, the pK(a) of the quinoidal base in HBA 1 is only slightly stabilized in comparison with that of HBA 2 and HBA 3. The energy level of hemiketal increases with the number of acylated units, but the inversion of energies between hemiketal and quinoidal base takes place exclusively for HBA 1 (three acylated units), permitting in moderately acidic solutions the stabilization of the purple quinoidal base. Identical inversion of energy was observed for the corresponding ionized species, allowing the stabilization of the blue ionized quinoidal base in slightly basic solutions. At pH values higher than 8, the hydroxyl groups of the hydroxycinnamic acid units start to deprotonate disrupting the intramolecular sandwich-type stacking and the more or less slow degradation of the anthocyanin is observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据