4.7 Article

Raspberry promotes brown and beige adipocyte development in mice fed high-fat diet through activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) alpha 1

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITIONAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 157-164

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2018.02.005

关键词

AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) alpha 1; Browning; Obesity; Raspberry; Thermogenesis

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-HD067449, R21-AG049976]
  2. National Processed Raspberry Council
  3. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD067449] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R21AG049976] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Development of brown and beige/brite adipocytes increases thermogenesis and helps to reduce obesity and metabolic syndrome. Our previous study suggests that dietary raspberry can ameliorate metabolic syndromes in diet-induced obese mice. Here, we further evaluated the effects of raspberry on energy expenditure and adaptive thermogenesis and determined whether these effects were mediated by AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Mice deficient in the catalytic subunit of AMPK alpha 1 and wild-type (WT) mice were fed a high-fat diet (HFD) or HFD supplemented with 5% raspberry (RAS) for 10 weeks. The thermogenic program and related regulatory factors in adipose tissue were assessed. RAS improved the insulin sensitivity and reduced fat mass in WT mice but not in AMPK alpha 1(-/-) mice. In the absence of AMPK alpha 1, RAS failed to increase oxygen consumption and heat production. Consistent with this, the thermogenic gene expression in brown adipose tissue and brown-like adipocyte formation in subcutaneous adipose tissue were not induced by RAS in AMPK alpha 1(-/-) mice. In conclusion, AMPK alpha 1 is indispensable for the effects of RAS on brown and beige/brite adipocyte development, and prevention of obesity and metabolic dysfunction. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据