4.5 Review

The differences between GluN2A and GluN2B signaling in the brain

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 96, 期 8, 页码 1430-1443

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24251

关键词

GluN2A; GluN2B; N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor; signaling differences

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 81771265, NSFC 81200886, NSFC 81402886]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [H2017208063]
  3. Key Project of the Research on Science and Technology of University of Hebei Province [ZD2017032]
  4. Key Basic Research Program of the Application Foundation Research Project of Hebei Province [15962704D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, a typical ionotropic glutamate receptor, is a crucial protein for maintaining brain function. GluN2A and GluN2B are the main types of NMDA receptor subunit in the adult forebrain. Studies have demonstrated that they play different roles in a number of pathophysiological processes. Although the underlying mechanism for this has not been clarified, the most fundamental reason may be the differences between the signaling pathways associated with GluN2A and GluN2B. With the aim of elucidating the reasons behind the diverse roles of these two subunits, we described the signaling differences between GluN2A and GluN2B from the aspects of C-terminus-associated molecules, effects on typical downstream signaling proteins, and metabotropic signaling. Because there are several factors interfering with the determination of subunit-specific signaling, there is still a long way to go toward clarifying the signaling differences between these two subunits. Developing better pharmacology tools, such as highly selective antagonists for triheteromeric GluN2A- and GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors, and establishing new molecular biological methods, for example, engineering photoswitchable NMDA receptors, may be useful for clarifying the signaling differences between GluN2A and GluN2B.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据