4.7 Article

Short-Term Plasticity Combines with Excitation-Inhibition Balance to Expand Cerebellar Purkinje Cell Dynamic Range

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 38, 期 22, 页码 5153-5167

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3270-17.2018

关键词

excitation-inhibition balance; burst coding; feedforward inhibition; Purkinje cell; short-term dynamics

资金

  1. Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique
  2. Universite de Strasbourg
  3. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche Grant [ANR-15-CE37-0001-01 CeMod]
  4. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale [DEQ20140329514]
  5. Ministere de la Recherche
  6. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale fellowship
  7. Parkinsonfonden Sweden
  8. Strategic Research Area Neuroscience (StratNeuro) program of Sweden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The balance between excitation (E) and inhibition (I) in neuronal networks controls the firing rate of principal cells through simple network organization, such as feedforward inhibitory circuits. Here, we demonstrate in male mice, that at the granule cell (GrC)molecular layer interneuron (MLI)-Purkinje cell (PC) pathway of the cerebellar cortex, E/I balance is dynamically controlled by short-term dynamics during bursts of stimuli, shaping cerebellar output. Using a combination of electrophysiological recordings, optogenetic stimulation, and modeling, we describe the wide range of bidirectional changes in PC discharge triggered by GrC bursts, from robust excitation to complete inhibition. At high frequency (200 Hz), increasing the number of pulses in a burst (from 3 to 7) can switch a net inhibition of PC to a net excitation. Measurements of EPSCs and IPSCs during bursts and modeling showed that this feature can be explained by the interplay between short-term dynamics of the GrC-MLI-PC pathway and E/I balance impinging on PC. Our findings demonstrate that PC firing rate is highly sensitive to the duration of GrC bursts, which may define a temporal-to-rate code transformation in the cerebellar cortex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据