4.7 Article

Glial βII Spectrin Contributes to Paranode Formation and Maintenance

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 38, 期 27, 页码 6063-6075

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3647-17.2018

关键词

myelin; node of Ranvier; paranode; spectrin

资金

  1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society
  2. National Institutes of Health [NS044916]
  3. NIH NINDS Grant [5P30 NS047463]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Action potential conduction along myelinated axons depends on high densities of voltage-gated Na+ channels at the nodes of Ranvier. Flanking each node, paranodal junctions (paranodes) are formed between axons and Schwann cells in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) or oligodendrocytes in the CNS. Paranodal junctions contribute to both node assembly and maintenance. Despite their importance, the molecular mechanisms responsible for paranode assembly and maintenance remain poorly understood. beta II spectrin is expressed in diverse cells and is an essential part of the submembranous cytoskeleton. Here, we show that Schwann cell beta II spectrin is highly enriched at paranodes. To elucidate the roles of glial beta II spectrin, we generated mutant mice lacking beta II spectrin in myelinating glial cells by crossing mice with a floxed allele of Sptbn1 with Cnp-Cre mice, and analyzed both male and female mice. Juvenile (4 weeks) and middle-aged (60 weeks) mutant mice showed reduced grip strength and sciatic nerve conduction slowing, whereas no phenotype was observed between 8 and 24 weeks of age. Consistent with these findings, immunofluorescence microscopy revealed disorganized paranodes in the PNS and CNS of both postnatal day 13 and middle-aged mutant mice, but not in young adult mutant mice. Electron microscopy confirmed partial loss of transverse bands at the paranodal axoglial junction in the middle-aged mutant mice in both the PNS and CNS. These findings demonstrate that a spectrin-based cytoskeleton in myelinating glia contributes to formation and maintenance of paranodal junctions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据