4.2 Article

Surface Plasmon Resonance Aptamer Biosensor for Discriminating Pathogenic Bacteria Vibrio parahaemolyticus

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 1599-1605

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2018.14212

关键词

Pathogenic Bacteria; Vibrio parahaemolyticus; Vibriosis; Aptamer Biosensor; Whole Cell-SELEX; DNA Aptamer

资金

  1. Cooperative Research Program for agriculture Science and Technology Development - Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ01052301]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF-2015R1A4A1041869]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, whole-bacteria SELEX (WB-SELEX) strategy was adopted to isolate specific aptamers against Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Round selection for V. parahaemolyticus was conducted 11 rounds, including two negative selection rounds. It was determined through real-time PCR amplification and post-SELEX experiment. The selected aptmers had high binding property and specificity to V. parahaemolyticus. Of 28 aptamers tested, VPCA-apta# 1 had the highest binding affinity compared to other aptamer candidates obtained. To detect V. parahaemolyticus, aptamer based SPR biosensor platform was constructed and pathogenic bacteria sensing was conducted in two steps. The first step was to construct 5'-biotinylated VPCA-apta# 1 binding probe. The second step was to incubate V. parahaemolyticus and test microbes in functionalized SA sensor chip in parallel. Our platform showed significant activity for detecting and discriminating V. parahaemolyticus from other enteric species such as Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Sigella sonnei, and Vibrio fischeri. This is the first report on the use of whole-SELEX to isolate DNA aptamers specific for V. parahaemolyticus. We demonstrated the feasibility of using aptamer platform for the detection of V. parahaemolyticus in various food supplies. It might be used in multiple points of care for diagnosing Vibriosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据