4.7 Article

Mechanism of Peptide Binding and Cleavage by the Human Mitochondrial Peptidase Neurolysin

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 430, 期 3, 页码 348-362

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.11.011

关键词

mitochondria; proteolysis; peptide degradation; peptidase; presequence

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [DN2015-04833, DN2014-5667, DN2012-5145, DN529-2014-7499, DN2014-5867]
  2. Magnus Bergvalls Foundation
  3. Wenner-Gren Foundation
  4. Alzheimer Foundation
  5. Foundation for Geriatric Diseases at Karolinska Institutet
  6. Sigurd och Elsa Goljes Minne Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteolysis plays an important role in mitochondria! biogenesis, from the processing of newly imported precursor proteins to the degradation of mitochondrial targeting peptides. Disruption of peptide degradation activity in yeast, plant and mammalian mitochondria is known to have deleterious consequences for organism physiology, highlighting the important role of mitochondrial peptidases. In the present work, we show that the human mitochondrial peptidase neurolysin (hNLN) can degrade mitochondrial presequence peptides as well as other fragments up to 19 amino acids long. The crystal structure of hNLN(E475Q) in complex with the products of neurotensin cleavage at 2.7 angstrom revealed a closed conformation with an internal cavity that restricts substrate length and highlighted the mechanism of enzyme opening/closing that is necessary for substrate binding and catalytic activity. Analysis of peptide degradation in vitro showed that hNLN cooperates with presequence protease (PreP or PITRM1) in the degradation of long targeting peptides and amyloid-beta peptide, A beta 1-40, associated with Alzheimer disease, particularly cleaving the hydrophobic fragment A beta 35-40. These findings suggest that a network of proteases may be required for complete degradation of peptides localized in mitochondria. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据