4.3 Article

Production and analysis of a Bacillus subtilis biofilm comprised of vegetative cells and spores using a modified colony biofilm model

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 181-187

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.04.011

关键词

Bacillus subtilis; Biofilm; Spores; Colony; Antimicrobial; Disinfection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacillus subtilis is a spore-forming soil bacterium that is capable of producing robust biofilms. Sporulation can occur in B. subtilis biofilms and it is possible that the spores embedded in the protective matrix could present a significant challenge to disinfecting agents or processes. This article describes a method for the growth and quantification of a reproducible B. subtilis ATCC 35021 biofilm comprised of vegetative cells and spores using a modified colony biofilm model. In this method, membranes were inoculated and incubated for a total of 8 days to promote biofilm formation and subsequent sporulation within the biofilm. Representative samples were taken over the course of the incubation period to evaluate the biofilms using enumerative, microscopic, and spectrometric methods. At various time points, the total numbers of cells and spores were quantified. A Congo red agar (CRA) method was utilized to detect the TasA matrix protein, a primary component of the B. subtilis biofilm matrix. The presence of TasA was also confirmed using mass spectrometry. The biofilm morphologies were correlated to the enumeration data with a variety of correlative imaging techniques: confocal microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). At the end of the incubation period, the biofilm contained > 7 logs total colony forming units with spores comprising approximately 10% of the biofilm. The biofilm generated using this method allows researchers to use a new, more robust challenge for efficacy testing of chemical and physical antimicrobial treatments such as antibiotics, disinfectants, or heat.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据