4.7 Article

Lab-scale and pilot-scale fabrication of amine-functional reverse osmosis membrane with improved chlorine resistance and antimicrobial property

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 554, 期 -, 页码 221-231

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.02.062

关键词

Reverse osmosis membrane; Antimicrobial; Chlorine resistance; Regeneration; Pilot-scale study

资金

  1. Public Science and Technology Research Funds Projects of Ocean [201405009]
  2. National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2015BAB10B00]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [91534124]
  4. Science & Technology Pillar Program of Tianjin [14ZCZDSF00006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enhancing membrane flux, rejection, antimicrobial and chlorine resistance has been the focus of reverse osmosis membrane research. The permselectivity, chlorine resistance and antimicrobial properties of a polyamide (PA) membrane were improved by immobilization of self-synthesized amine functional hydantoin derivative poly(3-allyl-5,5-dimethylhydantoin-co-vinylamine) (P(ADMH-co-VAm)). The chlorine resistance and antimicrobial property of the modified membrane could be regenerated due to the reversible transition between hydantoin and N-halamine. The lab-scale virgin and modified membranes were systematically characterized, and their performances were evaluated and compared with some representative commercial membranes. The modified membrane showed similar permselectivity, but higher and regenerable chlorine resistance and antimicrobial property as compared with the commercial membrane e.g., BW30FR. Next, a pilot-scale 0.4-m wide continuous membrane production process was performed to fabricate membrane element. The permselectivity of the modified element was also improved. During the six chlorination-sterilization operation cycles, the element exhibited high antimicrobial property with small permselectivity changes. Thus, both the lab-scale and pilot-scale testing results demonstrated the improved performances of the modified membrane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据