4.8 Article

In Situ Infrared Ellipsometry for Protein Adsorption Studies on Ultrathin Smart Polymer Brushes in Aqueous Environment

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 7, 期 23, 页码 12430-12439

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/am5075997

关键词

polymer brushes; protein adsorption; solid-liquid interface; in situ infrared ellipsometly; stimuli-responsive; infrared spectroscopy

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG Hi 793/4-1, Ei 317/4-1, Sta 324/28-1]
  2. National Science Foundation within Materials World Network [DMR-1107786]
  3. National Science Foundation [1133300]
  4. Division Of Materials Research
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1107786] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  7. Directorate For Engineering [1133320] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The protein-adsorbing and -repelling properties of various smart nanometer-thin polymer brushes containing poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) and poly(acrylic acid) with high potential for biosensing and biomedical applications are studied by in situ infrared-spectroscopic ellipsometry (IRSE). IRSE is a highly sensitive nondestructive technique that allows protein adsorption on polymer brushes to be investigated in an aqueous environment as external stimuli, such as temperature and pH, are varied. These changes are relevant to conditions for regulation of protein adsorption and desorption for biotechnology, biocatalysis, and bioanalytical applications. Here brushes are used as model surfaces for controlling protein adsorption of human serum albumin and human fibrinogen. The important finding of this work is that IRSE in the in situ experiments in protein solutions can distinguish between contributions of polymer brushes and proteins. The vibrational bands of the polymers provide insights into the hydration state of the brushes, whereas the protein-specific amide bands are related to changes of the protein secondary structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据