4.8 Article

Beyond just sea-level rise: considering macroclimatic drivers within coastal wetland vulnerability assessments to climate change

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 1-11

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13084

关键词

climate change; climate gradient; coastal wetlands; ecological threshold; ecological transition; foundation species; mangrove; salt flat; salt marsh; vulnerability assessment

资金

  1. U.S. Geological Survey's Ecosystems Mission Area, U.S. Geological Survey's Climate & Land Use Change RD Program
  2. Department of Interior South Central Climate Science Center
  3. Department of Interior Southeast Climate Science Center
  4. Gulf Coastal Plains and Ozarks Landscape Conservation Cooperative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to their position at the land-sea interface, coastal wetlands are vulnerable to many aspects of climate change. However, climate change vulnerability assessments for coastal wetlands generally focus solely on sea-level rise without considering the effects of other facets of climate change. Across the globe and in all ecosystems, macroclimatic drivers (e.g., temperature and rainfall regimes) greatly influence ecosystem structure and function. Macroclimatic drivers have been the focus of climate change-related threat evaluations for terrestrial ecosystems, but largely ignored for coastal wetlands. In some coastal wetlands, changing macroclimatic conditions are expected to result in foundation plant species replacement, which would affect the supply of certain ecosystem goods and services and could affect ecosystem resilience. As examples, we highlight several ecological transition zones where small changes in macroclimatic conditions would result in comparatively large changes in coastal wetland ecosystem structure and function. Our intent in this communication is not to minimize the importance of sea-level rise. Rather, our overarching aim is to illustrate the need to also consider macroclimatic drivers within vulnerability assessments for coastal wetlands.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据