4.6 Article

Association of Structured Virtual Visits for Hypertension Follow-Up in Primary Care with Blood Pressure Control and Use of Clinical Services

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 33, 期 11, 页码 1862-1867

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4375-0

关键词

virtual visit; telemedicine; hypertension; blood pressure control

资金

  1. Ryoichi Sasakawa Fellowship Fund
  2. Brigham and Women's Hospital Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care
  3. Institutional National Research Service Award [T32HP10251]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundOptimal management of hypertension requires frequent monitoring and follow-up. Novel, pragmatic interventions have the potential to engage patients, maintain blood pressure control, and enhance access to busy primary care practices. Virtual visits are structured asynchronous online interactions between a patient and a clinician to extend medical care beyond the initial office visit.ObjectiveTo compare blood pressure control and healthcare utilization between patients who received virtual visits compared to usual hypertension care.DesignPropensity score-matched, retrospective cohort study with adjustment by difference-in-differences.ParticipantsPrimary care patients with hypertension.ExposurePatient participation in at least one virtual visit for hypertension. Usual care patients did not use a virtual visit but were seen in-person for hypertension.Main measuresAdjusted difference in mean systolic blood pressure, primary care office visits, specialist office visits, emergency department visits, and inpatient admissions in the 180days before and 180days after the in-person visit.Key resultsOf the 1051 virtual visit patients and 24,848 usual care patients, we propensity score-matched 893 patients from each group. Both groups were approximately 61years old, 44% female, 85% White, had about five chronic conditions, and about 20% had a mean pre-visit systolic blood pressure of 140-160mmHg. Compared to usual care, virtual visit patients had an adjusted 0.8 (95% CI, 0.3 to 1.2) fewer primary care office visits. There was no significant adjusted difference in systolic blood pressure control (0.6mmHg [95% CI, -2.0 to 3.1]), specialist visits (0.0 more visits [95% CI, -0.3 to 0.3]), emergency department visits (0.0 more visits [95% CI, 0.0 to 0.01]), or inpatient admissions (0.0 more admissions [95% CI, 0.0 to 0.1]).ConclusionsAmong patients with reasonably well-controlled hypertension, virtual visit participation was associated with equivalent blood pressure control and reduced in-office primary care utilization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据