4.0 Article

Physiological properties and genetic analysis related to exopolysaccharide (EPS) production in the fresh-water unicellular cyanobacterium Aphanothece sacrum (Suizenji Nori)

期刊

出版社

MICROBIOL RES FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.2323/jgam.2018.04.004

关键词

Aphanothece sacrum; Exopolysaccharide (EPS); unicellular cyanobacterium; Wzy-dependent pathway

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [15K07557, 15K07368]
  2. MEXT-supported Program for Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities, 2013-2017
  3. Adaptable and Seamless Technology Transfer Program through Target-driven R&D from Japan Science and Technology Agency [AS2915173U]
  4. Green Science Material Inc. (Kumamoto)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The clonal strains, phycoerythrin(PE)-rich- and PE-poor strains, of the unicellular, fresh water cyanobacterium Aphanothece sacrum (Suringar) Okada (Suizenji Nori, in Japanese) were isolated from traditional open-air aquafarms in Japan. A. sacrum appeared to be oligotrophic on the basis of its growth characteristics. The optimum temperature for growth was around 20 degrees C. Maximum growth and biomass increase at 20 degrees C was obtained under light intensities between 40 to 80 mu mol m(-2) S-1 (fluorescent lamps, 12 h light/12 h dark cycles) and between 40 to 120 mu mol m(-2) S-1 for PE-rich and PE-poor strains, respectively, of A. sacrum. I'urifled exopolysaccharide (EPS) of A. sacrurn has a molecular weight of ca. 10(4) kDa with five major monosaccharides (glucose, xytose, rhamnose, galactose and mannose; >= 85 mol%). We also deciphered the whole genome sequence of the two strains of A. sacrum. The putative genes involved in the polymerization, chain length control, and export of EPS would contribute to understand the biosynthetic process of their extremely high molecular weight El'S. The putative genes encoding Wzx-Wzy-Wzz- and Wza-Wzb-Wzc were conserved in the A. sacrurn strains FPU1 and FPU3. This result suggests that the Wzy-dependent pathway participates in the El's production of A. sacrum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据