4.7 Article

Effects of microwave combined with conduction heating on surimi quality and morphology

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
卷 228, 期 -, 页码 1-11

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.01.021

关键词

Surimi; Gel strength; Water bath; Microwave; Microstructure

资金

  1. six talent peak high-level talent project of Jiangsu Province [2015-NY-008]
  2. teaching and researching Joint innovation funds of Jiangsu Province [BY2015019-05]
  3. program of Collaborative innovation center of food safety and quality control in Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Past studies have reported that microwave heating (MW) usually leads to higher cooking loss and texture deterioration in surimi processing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different microwave heating methods on surimi gel properties. Compared to traditional two steps water bath heating method (WB), using microwave heating to replace the first step of water bath heating would lead to the deterioration of surimi quality. By contrast, using microwave heating to replace the second step of water bath heating could significantly improve gel strength and water holding capacity. Microwave heating contributed to gelation and promoted the cross-linking of proteins via disulfide and non disulfide covalent bonds. From scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), microwave heating coupled to the traditional water heating method resulted in more compact network structures. Although the favorable gel strength was obtained by both the time dependent mode and temperature preservation mode, CLSM three-dimensional micrographs revealed that the time-dependent mode contributed to shrinkage and rough surfaces. Therefore, the rapid heating rate of microwave results in the aggregation of proteins with superior texture, and the temperature preservation mode results in desirable morphology and improved texture. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据