4.6 Article

Stable isotope analysis of major bioelements, multi-element profiling, and discriminant analysis for geographical origins of organically grown potato

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
卷 71, 期 -, 页码 17-24

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2018.04.005

关键词

Food analysis; Food composition; Traceability; Geographical origin; Potato; Stable isotopes; Elements; Rare earth elements

资金

  1. European Union Seventh Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration [621329]
  2. Horizon research and an Innovation Programme [692241]
  3. Slovenian Research Agency [P1-0143]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The traceability of food products in terms of their geographical origins is getting more and more public attention. To be certain of the origin of organically grown potato (Soloman tuberosum L.), samples were subjected to stable isotope analysis of the major bioelements (delta C-13, delta N-15, delta O-18, delta S-34) and to element profiling (Na, Mg, P, S, Cl, K, Ca, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Mo, Br, Rb, Sr), which included the rare earth elements (Sc, Y, Nb, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Dy, Er). The present study was performed at the scale of Slovenia, which has diverse geographical characteristics. Using supervised pattern recognition statistical analysis (i.e., multivariate discriminant analysis), the characterisation and classification of organically grown potatoes were defined in terms of four Slovenian macro-regions: the Alpine, Dinaric, Mediterranean and Pannonian regions. The proposed model showed that 100% of the samples were correctly classified. However, an important prerequisite for official monitoring of the origin of a commodity is the availability of national and/or international databanks. As no databank exists for potato to date, the present study was performed to initiate the collection of data at the national level, to build a relevant and up-to-date databank. Once established, a reliable traceability model can be created.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据