4.7 Article

Effects of surface roughness on a separating turbulent boundary layer

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
卷 841, 期 -, 页码 552-580

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2018.101

关键词

boundary layer separation; turbulence simulation; turbulent boundary layers

资金

  1. Hydro-Quebec
  2. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) under the Collaborative Research and Development program [CRDPJ 418786-11]
  3. Canada Research Chair program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Separating turbulent boundary layers over smooth and rough flat plates are studied by large-eddy simulations. A suction-blowing velocity distribution imposed at the top boundary of the computation domain produces an adverse-to-favourable pressure gradient and creates a closed separation bubble. The Reynolds number based on the momentum thickness and the free-stream velocity before the pressure gradient begins is 2500. Virtual sand grain roughness in the fully rough regime is modelled by an immersed boundary method. Compared with a smooth-wall case, streamline detachment occurs earlier and the separation region is substantially larger for the rough-wall case, due to the momentum deficit caused by the roughness. The adverse pressure gradient decreases the form drag, so that the point where the wall stress vanishes does not coincide with the detachment of the flow from the surface. A thin reversed-flow region is formed below the roughness crest; the presence of recirculation regions behind each roughness element also affects the intermittency of the near-wall flow, so that upstream of the detachment point the flow can be reversed half of the time, but its average velocity can still be positive. The separated shear layer exhibits higher turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) in the rough-wall case, the growth of the TKE there begins earlier relative to the separation point, and the peak TKE occurs close to the separation point. The momentum deficit caused by the roughness, again, plays a critical role in these changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据