4.6 Article

A possible approach to improving the reproducibility of urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites and phenols during pregnancy

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41370-018-0050-0

关键词

Child exposure/health; Endocrine disruptors; Phenols; Phthalates; Pregnancy; Prenatal exposure

资金

  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [RD-83459301, RD-835434010]
  2. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS/NIH) [P20 ES018163, P20 ES018163-S1, P01 ES022848, R01 ES014864]
  3. NIEHS [T32 ES007069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In epidemiologic studies, classifying episodic exposures to chemicals with short half-lives, such as phthalates and phenols, is challenging. We assessed whether accounting for sources of variability unrelated to exposure pathways would improve the reproducibility of urine concentrations of select phthalate metabolites and phenols. In 2011, a subset of pregnant women (n = 19) enrolled in a prospective study provided first morning urine samples every 3-4 weeks between 16 and 36 weeks gestation. At the time of collection, we identified potential contributors to variations in urinary concentrations: weight gain, gestational age, time slept, time since awoke, time since last food/drink, and time since last void. We estimated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) among repeat urine concentrations with and without adjustment for sources of variability using a random intercept linear mixed model. Concentrations of monoethyl phthalate, butyl, and propyl parabens were the most reproducible (ICCs: 0.68, 0.56, and 0.56, respectively). However, adjustment for potential sources of variability unrelated to exposure pathways did not materially improve reproducibility nor the ability of a single sample to predict exposure based on average biomarker concentrations across pregnancy. Future studies should carefully consider the exposure timeframe and the reliability of using biomarker concentrations from a single time point to represent exposures over pregnancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据