4.7 Article

Fabrication of hydrophobic fluorinated silica-polyamide thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membranes with dramatically improved salt rejection

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 510, 期 -, 页码 127-132

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.09.062

关键词

Thin film nanocomposite; Reverse osmosis; Hydrophobic nanoparticles; Fluorinated silica

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51408581]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2016J05143]
  3. Bureau of International Cooperation, CAS [132C35KYSB20160018]
  4. Bureau of Frontier Sciences Education, CAS [QYZDB-SSW-DQC044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis (TFN RO) membranes incorporated with hydrophilic nanoparticles show a potential problem that the salt rejection can not be improved significantly. In this study, novel TFN RO membranes incorporated with hydrophobic fluorinated silica nanoparticles were fabricated to improve the salt rejection. Fluorinated silica nanoparticles were well dispersed in organic phase during the interfacial polymerization (IP) process. The TFN RO membranes were characterized with attenuated total reflectance infra-red, field emission scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy and water contact angle measurements. The preparation conditions of TFN RO membranes, including IP reaction time, organic solvent removal time, and fluorinated silica loading, were optimized by characterizing desalination performance using 2000 ppm NaCI aqueous solution at 1.55 MPa and 25 degrees C. The salt rejection increased significantly from 96.0% without fluorinated silica nanoparticles to 98.6% with the optimal 0.12% (w/v) fluorinated silica nanoparticles, while the water flux decreased slightly from 0.99 m(3)/m(2)/day to 0.93 m(3)/m(2)/day. This study demonstrated the potential use of hydrophobic nanoparticles in high-performance TFN RO membranes. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据