4.7 Article

Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance and Survival in Patients With Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 103, 期 7, 页码 2522-2533

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2017-02772

关键词

-

资金

  1. F. Hoffmann-La Roche (Basel, Switzerland)
  2. Gottfried and Julia Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation
  3. Novartis Foundation for Medical-Biomedical Research
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation
  5. AstraZeneca
  6. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  7. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  8. Eli Lilly
  9. GI Dynamics
  10. Intarcia
  11. Johnson Johnson
  12. Lexicon
  13. Medtronic
  14. Novo Nordisk
  15. Orexigen
  16. Sanofi
  17. Scion NeuroStim
  18. Takeda
  19. Theracos
  20. Abbvie
  21. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories
  22. Janssen
  23. Roche
  24. Servier
  25. Anthera
  26. Amgen
  27. Cerenis
  28. F. Hoffmann La Roche
  29. InfraReDx
  30. LipoScience
  31. Novartis
  32. Resverlogix
  33. Sanofi-Regeneron
  34. AFA Insurance Company
  35. Bayer AG
  36. Karolinska Institutet Funds
  37. Swedish Diabetes Association
  38. Swedish Heart Lung Foundation
  39. F. Hoffmann-La Roche
  40. Amarin
  41. Isis
  42. Merck
  43. Pfizer
  44. Sanofi-Aventis
  45. DalCor
  46. Medicines Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Insulin resistance has been linked to development and progression of atherosclerosis and is present in most patients with type 2 diabetes. Whether the degree of insulin resistance predicts adverse outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is uncertain. Design: The Effect of Aleglitazar on Cardiovascular Outcomes after Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus trial compared the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-a/g agonist aleglitazar with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes and recent ACS. In participants not treated with insulin, we determined whether baseline homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; n = 4303) or the change in HOMA-IR on assigned study treatment (n = 3568) was related to the risk of death or major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) in unadjusted and adjusted models. Because an inverse association of HOMA-IR with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has been described, we specifically examined effects of adjustment for the latter. Results: In unadjusted analysis, twofold higher baseline HOMA-IR was associated with lower risk of death [hazard ratio (HR): 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.91, P = 0.002]. Adjustment for 24 standard demographic and clinical variables had minimal effect on this association. However, after further adjustment for NT-proBNP, the association of HOMA-IR with death was no longer present (adjusted HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.19, P = 0.94). Baseline HOMA-IR was not associated with major adverse cardiovascular events, nor was the change in HOMA-IR on study treatment associated with death or major adverse cardiovascular events. Conclusions: After accounting for levels of NT-proBNP, insulin resistance assessed by HOMA-IR is not related to the risk of death or major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes and ACS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据