4.2 Article

Poor in vivo efficacy of caspofungin, micafungin and amphotericin B against wild-type Candida krusei clinical isolates does not correlate with in vitro susceptibility results

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 233-239

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1120009X.2018.1487150

关键词

Echinocandin susceptibility; 50% serum; killing rate; neutropenic murine model

资金

  1. Astellas
  2. Pfizer
  3. European Union
  4. MSD
  5. European Social Fund
  6. [TAMOP 4.2.4. A/2-11-1-2012-0001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We determined micafungin, caspofungin and amphotericin B (AMB) minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs) and killing rates in RPMI-1640 and in RPMI-1640 with 50% serum against three Candida krusei bloodstream isolates. MIC ranges in RPMI-1640 were 0.125-0.25, 0.25 and 0.125-0.5 mg/L, in RPMI-1640 with 50% serum, MICs were 64-128-, 8- and 4-16-fold higher, respectively. In RPMI-1640 micafungin and caspofungin at 1, 4, 16 and 32 mg/L as well as AMB at 2 mg/L were fungicidal against all isolates in <= 3.96, <= 4.42 and 14.96 h, respectively. In RPMI-1640 with 50% serum, caspofungin was fungicidal for all isolates only at 32 mg/L, micafungin and AMB were fungistatic. In neutropenic mice, 5 mg/kg caspofungin and 1 mg/kg AMB were ineffective against two of the three isolates. Thus, in vivo efficacy of echinocandins and AMB is weak or absent against C. krusei. Prescribers treating C. krusei infections with echinocandins should watch out for clinical resistance and therapeutic failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据