4.7 Article

NEAT1 contributes to breast cancer progression through modulating miR-448 and ZEB1

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 233, 期 11, 页码 8558-8566

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.26470

关键词

breast cancer; miR-448; NEAT1; ZEB1

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81502510]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning [201440318]
  3. Shanghai East Rising Sun Program [DFZY-12]
  4. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [17411968800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Breast cancer is a kind of common female cancers. Increasing evidence has exhibited that lncRNAs exert a crucial role in breast cancer. So far, the mechanism of lncRNAs in breast cancer is still not well established. In our current study, we focused on the biological role of lncRNA Nuclear Enriched Abundant Transcript 1 (NEAT1) in breast cancer. We observed that NEAT1 levels were significantly increased in human breast cancer cells including MCF-7, MDA-MB-453, MDA-MB-231, and SKBR3 cells compared to normal mammary epithelial cells MCF-10A while miR-448 was decreased. We found that downregulation of NEAT1 was able to inhibit the growth of breast cancer cells and miR-448 mimic exerted the similar function. Bioinformatics analysis and dual luciferase reporter assays confirmed the negative correlation between NEAT1 and miR-448 in vitro. In addition, ZEB1 was predicted as a novel mRNA target of miR-448. Overexpression of NEAT1 can induce breast cancer cell growth, migration, and invasion by inhibiting miR-448 and upregulating ZEB1. It was demonstrated that NEAT1 can increase ZEB1 levels while miR-448 mimic can repress ZEB1. It was speculated in our study that NEAT1 can serve as a competing endogenous lncRNA (ceRNA) to modulate ZEB1 by sponging miR-448 in breast cancer. To conclude, we uncovered that NEAT1 participated in breast cancer progression by regulating miR-448 and ZEB1. NEAT1 can be provided as a vital biomarker in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据