4.5 Article

Hydrogen gas inhalation protects against cutaneous ischaemia/reperfusion injury in a mouse model of pressure ulcer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 22, 期 9, 页码 4243-4252

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13704

关键词

hydrogen; inflammation; oxidative stress; pressure ulcer; reperfusion injury; wound healing

资金

  1. Grant of Shanghai Key Medical Discipline for Dermatology [2017ZZ02002]
  2. Grant of Shanghai leading talent project
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant [2016M600286]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pressure ulcer formation depends on various factors among which repetitive ischaemia/reperfusion(I/R) injury plays a vital role. Molecular hydrogen (H-2) was reported to have protective effects on I/R injuries of various internal organs. In this study, we investigated the effects of H-2 inhalation on pressure ulcer and the underlying mechanisms. H-2 inhalation significantly reduced wound area, 8-oxo-dG level (oxidative DNA damage) and cell apoptosis rates in skin lesions. H-2 remarkably decreased ROS accumulation and enhanced antioxidant enzymes activities by up-regulating expression of Nrf2 and its downstream components in wound tissue and/or H2O2-reated endothelia. Meanwhile, H-2 inhibited the overexpression of MCP-1, E-selectin, P-selectin and ICAM-1 in oxidant-induced endothelia and reduced inflammatory cells infiltration and proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-1, IL-6 and IL-8) production in the wound. Furthermore, H-2 promoted the expression of pro-healing factors (IL-22, TGF-beta, VEGF and IGF1) and inhibited the production of MMP9 in wound tissue in parallel with acceleration of cutaneous collagen synthesis. Taken together, these data indicated that H-2 inhalation suppressed the formation of pressure ulcer in a mouse model. Molecular hydrogen has potentials as a novel and alternative therapy for severe pressure ulcer. The therapeutic effects of molecular hydrogen might be related to its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, pro-healing actions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据