4.2 Article

Independent mapping methods reveal rotational activation near pulmonary veins where atrial fibrillation terminates before pulmonary vein isolation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 687-695

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jce.13446

关键词

atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; FIRM mapping; focal activation; rotors

资金

  1. NIH Clinical Center [NIH K24-103800]
  2. NIH [R01 HL83359]
  3. British Heart Foundation [FS/14/46/30907] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate mechanisms by which atrial fibrillation (AF) may terminate during ablation near the pulmonary veins before the veins are isolated (PVI). Introduction: It remains unstudied how AF may terminate during ablation before PVs are isolated. or how patients with PV reconnection can be arrhythmia-free. We studied patients in whom PV antral ablation terminated AF before PVI, using two independent mapping methods. Methods: We studied patients with AF referred for ablation, in whom biatrial contact basket electrograms were studied by both an activation/phase mapping method and by a second validated mapping method reported not to create false rotational activity. Results: In 22 patients (age 60.1 +/- 10.4, 36% persistent AF), ablation at sites near the PVs terminated AF (77% to sinus rhythm) prior to PVI. AF propagation revealed rotational (n = 20) and focal (n = 2) patterns at sites of termination by mapping method 1 and method 2. Both methods showed organized sites that were spatially concordant (P <0.001) with similar stability (P < 0.001). Vagal slowing was not observed at sites of AF termination. Discussion: PV antral regions where ablation terminated AF before PVI exhibited rotational and focal activation by two independent mapping methods. These data provide an alternative mechanism for the success of PVI, and may explain AF termination before PVI or lack of arrhythmias despite PV reconnection. Mapping such sites may enable targeted PV lesion sets and improved freedom from AF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据