4.2 Article

Psychosocial Job Factors and Biological Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Mexican Workers

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE
卷 58, 期 3, 页码 331-351

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22410

关键词

psychosocial job stressors; job content questionnaire; occupational health; blood glucose; blood cholesterol; adiposity indicators; blood pressure; smoking; leisure-time physical activity

资金

  1. NIH [5D43TW000623]
  2. National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT) in Mexico City [Salud-2005-02-14451]
  3. Southern California NIOSH Education and Research Center from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [T42 OH0084]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundPsychosocial job factors (PJF) have been implicated in the development of cardiovascular disease. The paucity of data from developing economies including Mexico hampers the development of worksite intervention efforts in those regions. MethodsThis cross-sectional study of 2,330 Mexican workers assessed PJF (job strain [JS], social support [SS], and job insecurity [JI]) and biological cardiovascular disease risk factors [CVDRF] by questionnaire and on-site physical examinations. Alternative formulations of the JS scales were developed based on factor analysis and literature review. Associations between both traditional and alternative job factor scales with CVDRF were examined in multiple regression models, adjusting for physical workload, and socio-demographic factors. ResultsAlternative formulations of the job demand and control scales resulted in substantial changes in effect sizes or statistical significance when compared with the original scales. JS and JI showed hypothesized associations with most CVDRF, but they were inversely associated with diastolic blood pressure and some adiposity measures. SS was mainly protective against CVDRF. ConclusionAmong Mexican workers, alternative PJF scales predicted health outcomes better than traditional scales, and psychosocial stressors were associated with most CVDRF. Am. J. Ind. Med. 58:331-351, 2015. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据