4.5 Article

Ex Vivo Study of Telluride Nanowires in Minigut

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 978-986

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2018.2578

关键词

Minigut; Organoids; Nanowires; Bismuth Telluride; Toxicity

资金

  1. Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA) Career Award [348137]
  2. PhRMA Foundation Research Starter Award [RSGTMT17]
  3. McGee-Wagner Interdisciplinary Research Foundation
  4. NIH [2RO1 DK095662]
  5. VA Merit grant [1I01CX001353]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compound semiconductor nanomaterials, such as telluride nanowires, nanorods, and nanoparticles, have many unique properties for wide range of potential applications. The interaction between organoids (a biological system) and telluride nanowires is a crucial research area for human health in terms of its safety concerns. In this study, we demonstrated a case study on Bi2Te3 nanowires. Through live/dead cell viability testing, bright-light image analysis, and surface area calculations, we showed that 50 mu g/mL Bi2Te3 exerts minimum influence on shrinking crypts and disrupting lumen structure, which causes unhealthy growth. Within this optimal concentration, Bi2Te3 nanowires can stay as a stable and non-toxic material inside the intestine. Unlike the previous studies of the cytotoxicity of Telluride nanomaterials interacting with single type of cells, our research demonstrated the first study of the interactions of engineered Telluride nanomaterials with a real complex gastrointestinal tract system as our primary small intestinal crypts were directly isolated from mice and grew into a self-renewable system with various types of cells and different cell pathways, which has the capability to mimic a fully functional intestinal epithelium layer for a realistic study inside the gastrointestinal tract. Most importantly, we showed that Bi2Te3 nanowires, under infrared exposure, can act as a potential shield to stimulate cell viability and improve cell survivability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据