4.3 Article

Model resin composites incorporating ZnO-NP: activity against S-mutans and physicochemical properties characterization

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE
卷 26, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

UNIV SAO PAULO FAC ODONTOLOGIA BAURU
DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0270

关键词

Resin composite; Zinc oxide; Nanoparticles; S. mutans; Physicochemical properties

资金

  1. FAPERJ [E-26/111.194/2011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although resin composites are widely used in the clinical practice, the development of recurrent caries at composite-tooth interface still remains as one of the principal shortcomings to be overcome in this field. Objectives: To evaluate the activity against S. mutans biofilm of model resin composites incorporating different concentrations of ZnO-nanoparticles (ZnO-NP) and characterize their physicochemical properties. Materials and Methods: Different concentrations of ZnO-NP (wt.%): E1=0, E2=0.5, E3=1, E4=2, E5=5 and E6=10 were incorporated into a model resin composite consisting of Bis-GMA-TEGDMA and barium borosilicate particles. The activity against S. mutans biofilm was evaluated by metabolic activity and lactic acid production. The following physicochemical properties were characterized: degree of conversion (DC%), flexural strength (FS), elastic modulus (EM), hardness (KHN), water sorption (W-sp), water solubility (W-sl) and translucency (TP). Results: E3, E4, E5 and E6 decreased the biofilm metabolic activity and E5 and E6 decreased the lactic acid production (p<0.05). E6 presented the lowest DC% (p<0.05). No significant difference in FS and EM was found for all resin composites (p>0.05). E5 and E6 presented the lowest values of KHN (p<0.05). E6 presented a higher Wsp than E1 (p<0.05) and the highest W-sl (p<0.05). The translucency significantly decreased as the ZnO-NP concentration increased (p<0.05). Conclusions: The incorporation of 2 - 5 wt.% of ZnO-NP could endow antibacterial activity to resin composites, without jeopardizing their physicochemical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据