4.7 Article

Efficient degradation of rhodamine B with magnetically separable Ag3PO4@MgFe2O4 composites under visible irradiation

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 735, 期 -, 页码 1277-1290

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.245

关键词

Inhibition of Ag3PO4 photocorrosion; Ag3PO4@MgFe2O4 composites; RhB degradation; Visible light-driven; Possible mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51768031]
  2. key Research and Development Program in Gansu Province [17YF1NA056]
  3. earmarked fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System [nycytx-15]
  4. Open Research Fund Program of Key Laboratory of Urban Stormwater System and Water Environment (Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture), Ministry of Education [515205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel magnetically separable micro-nanostructure Ag3PO4@MgFe2O4 composites were successfully prepared via an ion-exchange deposition process. With Rhodmine B (RhB) as the model organic pollutant, Ag3PO4@MgFe2O4 system exhibited much superior degradation performance and stability, which was comparative to Ag3PO4 and MgFe2O4 system. The characterization results showed that Ag3PO4@MgFe2O4(10%) possessed high dispersion, large pore size (similar to 24 nm), larger transient photocurrent and longer fluorescence lifetime (similar to 10.83 ns). Furthermore, the effect of various parameters, such as temperature, initial pH, RhB concentration and catalyst loading on the RhB degradation were discussed in detail. Characterization results further indicate the MgFe2O4 over Ag3PO4 surface can inhibit Ag3PO4 from photocorrosion. Comparing the activity results dependence with the characterization results, it was indicated that the dependence of the photocatalytic activity on the efficient separation of photogenerated h(+)-e(-) pairs. This result indicates that the Ag3PO4@MgFe2O4(10%) catalyst can be a promising candidate for organic dyes degradation in waste water. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据