4.1 Article

Cloning and characterization of the nicotianamine synthase gene in Eruca vesicaria subsp sativa

期刊

GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 18121-18130

出版社

FUNPEC-EDITORA
DOI: 10.4238/2015.December.22.38

关键词

Eruca vesicaria subsp sativa; Nicotianamine synthase; Gene cloning

资金

  1. Science and Technology Department of Hubei Province
  2. Huangshi Science and Technology Bureau
  3. Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, China
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30771382, 30671334, 30971807, 31201238]
  5. European Committee [211400]
  6. Swedish Research Links Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nicotianamine (NA) is a ubiquitous metabolite in plants that bind heavy metals, is crucial for metal homeostasis, and is also an important metal chelator that facilitates long-distance metal transport and sequestration. NA synthesis is catalyzed by the enzyme nicotianamine synthase (NAS). Eruca vesicaria subsp sativa is highly tolerant to Ni, Pb, and Zn. In this study, a gene encoding EvNAS was cloned and characterized in E. vesicaria subsp sativa. The full-length EvNAS cDNA sequence contained a 111-bp 5'-untranslated region (UTR), a 155-bp 3'-UTR, and a 966-bp open reading frame encoding 322-amino acid residues. The EvNAS genomic sequence contained no introns, which is similar to previously reported NAS genes. The deduced translation of EvNAS contained a well-conserved NAS domain (1-279 amino acids) and an LIKI-CGEAEG box identical to some Brassica NAS and to the LIRL-box in most plant NAS, which is essential for DNA binding. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that EvNAS was most closely related to Brassica rapa NAS3 within the Cruciferae, followed by Thlaspi NAS1, Camelina NAS3, and Arabidopsis NAS3. A reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction indicated that EvNAS expression was greatest in the leaves, followed by the flower buds and hypocotyls. EvNAS was moderately expressed in the roots.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据