4.7 Article

Brg1 promotes both tumor-suppressive and oncogenic activities at distinct stages of pancreatic cancer formation

期刊

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 658-671

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.256628.114

关键词

Brg1; IPMN; dedifferentiation; pancreatic cancer; Kras; EMT

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute (NCI) [R01CA172045, R01CA112537]
  2. NIH/NCI [R01CA178015, K08CA137153]
  3. Pancreatic Cancer Action Network-American Association for Cancer Research Pathway to Leadership Award
  4. American Association of Cancer Research
  5. Daichi Sankyo
  6. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [K08CA137153, P01CA163200, R01CA172045, R01CA178015, R01CA112537] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) develops predominantly through pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) precursor lesions. Pancreatic acinar cells are reprogrammed to a ductal-like state during PanIN-PDA formation. Here, we demonstrate a parallel mechanism operative in mature duct cells during which functional cells undergo ductal retrogression to form IPMN-PDA. We further identify critical antagonistic roles for Brahma-related gene 1 (Brg1), a catalytic subunit of the SWI/SNF complexes, during IPMN-PDA development. In mature duct cells, Brg1 inhibits the dedifferentiation that precedes neoplastic transformation, thus attenuating tumor initiation. In contrast, Brg1 promotes tumorigenesis in full-blown PDA by supporting a mesenchymal-like transcriptional landscape. We further show that JQ1, a drug that is currently being tested in clinical trials for hematological malignancies, impairs PDA tumorigenesis by both mimicking some and inhibiting other Brg1-mediated functions. In summary, our study demonstrates the context-dependent roles of Brg1 and points to potential therapeutic treatment options based on epigenetic regulation in PDA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据