4.7 Article

The effects of hydrogen addition, inlet temperature and wall thermal conductivity on the flame-wall thermal coupling of premixed propane/air mixtures in meso-scale tubes

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 43, 期 22, 页码 10458-10468

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.097

关键词

Propane/air flame; Hydrogen addition; Meso-scale combustion; Flame-wall thermal coupling

资金

  1. Key Research Training Program of Science [2014CX01007]
  2. Technology Innovation Plan of Beijing Institute of Technology [2014CX01007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of hydrogen addition, inlet temperature, wall thermal conductivity and wall thickness on the flame-wall coupling of the propane/air flames in a meso-scale tube are numerically investigated using a two dimensional model along with the detailed chemical mechanism. Higher wall thermal conductivity can result in preheating the fresh mixture uniformly in strongly flame-wall coupled system, which is vital to enhance the burning rate of fuel mixture. With the increase of wall thermal conductivity or hydrogen addition, the leading edge of the flame shifts from the wall to the axis, meanwhile the flame is more convex towards the unburned side near the leading edge. As the hydrogen addition and inlet temperature increase, the flame propagation speed increases significantly, while the maximum temperature and maximum total enthalpy decrease due to the reduced heat recirculation power. The flame propagation speed has a negative correlation with heat loss. The chemical reactions in preheat zone are enhanced at low wall thermal conductivity due to the higher inner wall temperature. Thinner combustor wall leads to higher flame speed and higher heat loss simultaneously. Results have implications on the choice of solid wall material and heat recirculation design in a stable meso-scale combustor for different fuels. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据