4.7 Article

A general approach to fast prototype the topology of braided structures

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2018.06.006

关键词

Geometrical modeling; Overbraiding kinematics; Braided composites; Arbitrary cross-section; Non-straight mandrel; Finite element analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The braiding technique has been adapted to fabricate advanced composite structures. One of the most important advantages of braiding technique is that it can form a continuous and integrated part on complex shapes which is highly challenging by other composite manufacturing methods. However, the design and analysis methodologies of braided composites such as finite element analysis are limited even with computer aided tools due to the complexity of the realistic 3D representations of braided structures. The general strategy is to use multi-scale models to account for elastic constants at each hierarchy where material properties are homogenized. If one could directly use the topology of the braided structure in the finite element analysis, there is no need to perform multi-scale analysis on the part. In this paper, we propose a general method to generate 3D representations of braided structures using explicitly expressed formulas. Kinematics of braiding, discretization of an arbitrary centerline curve, and definition of convex cross-sections along the braiding directions are the foundations required to derive the 3D geometrical representation of a braided structure on complex shape mandrel presented in the proposed method. The topology of braided structure generated by the model is validated by the physical structures which are digitized into STL file by 3D laser scanning. A finite element model based on the topology is also performed to demonstrate the robustness of the model. The model is a computationally inexpensive and versatile applicable for any non-straight and non-concave shape mandrel given that it is braidable. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据