4.7 Article

Characterization of a novel thermostable GH7 endoglucanase from Chaetomium thermophilum capable of xylan hydrolysis

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.189

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Technology R&D Program of China [2015BAD15B05]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [31671985]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China [ZR2018BC014]
  4. Funds of Taishan Scholar Construction Project [TS201712023]
  5. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology Open Fund [SDKL2017015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new endoglucanase encoding gene (ctendo7) was cloned from the thermophilic fungus Chaetomium thermophilum and heterologously expressed in Pichia pastoris. The recombinant CTendo7 enzyme was purified by Ni2+ affinity chromatography and subsequently characterized. CTendo7 belongs to glycoside hydrolase family 7, and exhibited considerable activity against sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC-Na) and xylan of 1.91 IU/mg and 3.05 IU/mg at the optimum reaction condition of 55 degrees C, pH 5.0, respectively. The purified enzyme displayed relatively good thermostability. The residual endoglucanase and xylanase activities were 743% and 66.2% after a 60 min pre-incubation at 70 degrees C. Additionally, Ag+, Fe3+ and Cu2+ negatively affected the enzyme's activity, while the presence of 1 mM and 5 mM Mn2+ significantly enhanced both endoglucanase and xylanase activities. Generation of soluble oligosaccharides from lignocellulose is a critical step in bioethanol production, and it is noteworthy that CTendo7 produced cello-oligosaccharides and xylo-oligosaccharides from the continuous enzymatic saccharification of CMC-Na and xylan, respectively. This is the first detailed report on a novel bifunctional endoglucanase/xylanase enzyme from C. thermophilum. Furthermore, the excellent properties of CTendo7 distinguish it as a promising candidate for industrial lignocellulosic biomass conversion. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据