4.7 Article

Polyguluronate sulfate (PGS) attenuates immunological liver injury in vitro and in vivo

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.098

关键词

Polyguluronate sulfate; Con A; Liver injury; Oxidative stress; Hepatoprotective effect

资金

  1. NSFC [U1606403, U1706210]
  2. Innovation Project of Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology [2015ASKJ02]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31500646, 81741146]
  4. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2017MH013]
  5. Shandong Key Scientific and Technology Program [2015ZDJ504002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatocyte damage, especially immunological liver injury, is a key process in the pathogenesis of hepatitis virus induced liver diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the protective effects of polyguluronate sulfate (PGS) against immunological liver damage. The results showed that PGS significantly reduced the H2O2-induced oxidative stress and increased the cell viability in HepG2 hepatocytes. PGS also suppressed the production of malondialdehyde (MDA), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), TNF-alpha, and IL-6, while up-regulating the activity of SOD in HepG2 cells. Further, PGS (150 and 300 mg/kg/day) significantly attenuated the elevation of serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBiL), in addition to liver MDA and NO levels in Con A-induced immunological liver injury within mice (P < 0.05). Significant improvements of organ indexes (liver, spleen, and thymus) were observed in PGS-treated mice. PGS also significantly reduced the disorganization of hepatocytes and decreased the inflammatory cell infiltration caused by Con A treatment, suggesting that PGS was able to attenuate Con A-induced liver injury. In conclusion, PGS possesses significant hepatoprotective effects on immunological liver injury in vitro and in vivo, and this may be related to its antioxidant activities. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据