4.7 Article

A group decision-making method considering both the group consensus and multiplicative consistency of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 466, 期 -, 页码 109-128

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.07.031

关键词

Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation; Group decision making; Multiplicative consistency; Group consensus

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71740021, 61263018, 11461030]
  2. Thirteen five Programming Project of Jiangxi Province Social Science (2016) [16GL19]
  3. Graduate Innovation Foundation of Jiangxi Province [YC2017-B067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates a group decision-making (GDM) method that considers group consensus and multiplicative consistency of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy (IVIF) preference relations (IVIFPRs). First, the mean and variance of IVIF values (IVIFVs) are defined and a ranking method for IVIFVs is proposed considering the risk attitude of the expert. Then, the group consensus is presented by the individual similarity between experts. An iteration algorithm is designed to improve the group consensus. A statistical comparative analysis validates this algorithm. Subsequently, a new multiplicative consistency of IVIFPR is defined based on the multiplicative consistency of interval fuzzy preference relation. Two single-objective programming models are established to extract the most optimistic and pessimistic interval priority weight vectors from an IVIFPR, respectively. In particular, if the feasible domains of these two models are empty, two adjusted programs are constructed to replace the originals. Combining the most optimistic and pessimistic interval priority weights, the IVIF priority weights are generated. Further, expert weights are derived from Markov model and used to derive the collective IVIFPR for generating the IVIF priority weights. Therefore, a new method is proposed to solve the GDM with IVIFPRs. Finally, two cases are analyzed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据