4.7 Article

De novo transcriptome sequencing of Torreya grandis reveals gene regulation in sciadonic acid biosynthesis pathway

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 47-60

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.04.041

关键词

Torreya grandis; Transcriptome; Sciadonic acid; Delta(6)-elongase; Delta(5)-desaturase

资金

  1. Special Fund for Forest Scientific Research in the Public Welfare [201504708]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31670687]
  3. Open fund of Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Modern Silvicultural Technology [201607]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Torreya grandis (T. grandis), a conifer of the Cephalotaxaceae family, yields rare and unique dried fruits of great nutritional value that contains a high level of novel UFA, sciadonic acid. The composition of sciadonic acid in different tissues and cultivars, and the molecular mechanisms underlying the biosynthesis of sciadonic acid in T. grandis, both of which remain unknown however, were investigated. Two cultivars, T. grandis cv. Yuanfei and Xifei were used to reveal in comparison the fatty acid composition of roots, stems, leaves, arils and kernels. It was found that the Yuanfei kernels had the highest levels of sciadonic acid with 17% in oil. In transcriptome analysis, a total of 80,235 and 82,454 unigenes were generated from five libraries of Yuanfei and Xifei cultivars, respectively. KEGG orthology enrichment of differentially expressed genes showed that lipid metabolism pathways were the most highly represented. In particular, six candidate unigenes (Delta(6)-elongase and Delta(5)-desaturase) encoding sciadonic acid elongase and desaturases with high expression levels in Yuanfei and Xifei kernels were identified. This study provides the first comprehensive genomic analysis of sciadonic acid biosynthesis and contributes to the understanding of the molecular mechanisms responsible for de novo fatty acid biosynthesis and high sciadonic acid accumulation in gymnosperm species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据